{"id":21,"date":"2011-06-20T20:26:05","date_gmt":"2011-06-20T20:26:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/178.79.155.39\/wordpress\/?page_id=21"},"modified":"2025-06-15T01:11:34","modified_gmt":"2025-06-15T01:11:34","slug":"journal-articles-and-short-monographs","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/?page_id=21","title":{"rendered":"Journal Articles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;The sugar in his tea: sexuality, patriarchy and sexual politics&#8217;, and &#8216;A response to comments: The modern significance of sexuality &#8211; and the sex drive&#8217;, reply to four comments by Marzio Barbagli, Rosella Ghigi, Roger Friedland and Eric Anderson, <em>Sociologica<\/em>, 3\/2016, doi: 10.2383\/85805 and doi: 10.2383\/85810,\u00a0\u00a0available free on www.Sociologica.Mulino.it.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/EconomicAffairs-2015-Economies-of-Desire.pdf\">&#8216;Economies of desire: Sexuality and the sex industry in the 21st century&#8217;<\/a>, <em>Economic Affairs<\/em>, 35(3):\u00a0 329-348,\u00a0October 2015.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/06\/2015-IntSoc-MaleSexualDeficit.pdf\">&#8216;The male sexual deficit: a social fact of the 21st century&#8217;<\/a>, <em>International Sociology<\/em>, 30(3): 314-335, May\u00a02015.<\/p>\n<p><!-- p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 12.0px; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'} p.p2 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 12.0px; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'; min-height: 15.0px} span.s1 {letter-spacing: -0.2px} -->&#8216;Beauty, intelligence and height: the black holes of sociology&#8217;, <em>Sociologica<\/em>, 2\/2013, doi:\u00a010.2383\/74857\u00a0 available free on \u00a0www.<em>Sociologica<\/em>.mulino.it<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The ethics of beauty and style: the value of erotic capital&#8217;\u00a0, <em>Critical Studies in Fashion and Beauty<\/em>, 2(1+2): 249-253, March 2012.<!-- p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; text-align: justify; line-height: 12.0px; font: 12.0px 'Times New Roman'} span.s1 {letter-spacing: -0.2px} --><\/p>\n<p><em>Feminist Myths and Magic Medicine<\/em>, London: Centre for Policy Studies, January 2011.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/ESR-Erotic-Capital-Oct-2010.pdf\">&#8216;Erotic capital&#8217;<\/a>, <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>,\u00a0 26(5): 499-518, October 2010.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;(How) can social policy and fiscal policy recognise unpaid family work?&#8217;, <em>Renewal<\/em>, 18: 23-33, May 2010.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Is gender equality legislation becoming counter-productive?&#8217;, <em>Public Policy Research<\/em>, 15: 133-136, September 2008.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Diversity in tastes, values and preferences: Comment on Jonung and Stahlberg&#8217;, <em>Economic Journal Watch<\/em>, 5: 204-218, May 2008.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Feminism, research evidence and the politics of work-life balance&#8217;, <em>Tidsskriftet Politik<\/em>, special issue on The Politics of Gender Equality, Denmark, spring 2007.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Dancing with the devil? Essentialism and other feminist heresies&#8217;, <em>British Journal of Sociology<\/em>, 58: 123-132, March 2007.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/BJGC-2006-article.pdf\">&#8216;Women, careers, and work-life preferences&#8217;<\/a>, <em>British Journal of Guidance and Counselling<\/em>, special issue edited by Amal Al-Sawad and Laurie Cohen, 34: 279-294, August 2006. Reprinted 2006 in Hungarian Journal <em>Tud\u00e1s Menedzsment<\/em><\/p>\n<p>`The search for equality&#8217; (review article), <em>Work and Occupations<\/em>, 30: 401-411, November 2003.<\/p>\n<p>`Public morality versus personal choice: the failure of social attitude surveys&#8217;, <em>British Journal of Sociology<\/em>, 54: 339-45, September 2003.<\/p>\n<p>`A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: preference theory&#8217;, <em>Population and Development Review<\/em>, 29: 349-74, September 2003.<\/p>\n<p>`Competing family models, competing social policies&#8217;, <em>Family Matters<\/em>, 64: 51-61, May 2003.<\/p>\n<p>`Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women&#8217;s differentiated labour market careers&#8217;, <em>Work and Occupations<\/em>, 29: 428-459, November 2002.<\/p>\n<p>`Taking women seriously&#8217;, <em>People and Place<\/em>, 9: 1-6, December 2001, Australia: Monash University Centre for Population and Urban Research.<\/p>\n<p>`Les femmes obtiennent-elles ce qu&#8217;elles veulent ou se contentent-elles de ce qu&#8217;on leur propose?&#8217; (Do women get what they want, or accept what they are given?), <em>Revue de l&#8217;OFCE &#8211; Observations et Diagnostics Economiques<\/em>, No. 77: 297-306, April 2001, Paris: Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques.\u00a0 Reprinted July 2001 in <em>Probl\u00e8mes Economiques<\/em>, No. 2721: 25-28.<\/p>\n<p>`Models of the family, women&#8217;s role and social policy: a new perspective from Preference Theory&#8217;, <em>European Societies<\/em>, 1: 25-50, April 1999.<\/p>\n<p>`The expansion of women&#8217;s part-time work in modern societies: a new perspective&#8217;, <em>Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Erziehungswissenschaft<\/em>, 4: 561-576, December 1998.<\/p>\n<p>`Developing a sociology for the 21st century: Preference Theory&#8217;, <em>British Journal of Sociology<\/em>, 49: 150-162, March 1998.<\/p>\n<p>`Labour mobility and employment stability: rhetoric and reality on the sex differential in labour market behaviour&#8217;, <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>, 12: 1-31, May 1996.<\/p>\n<p>`The sexual division of labour and women&#8217;s heterogeneity&#8217;, <em>British Journal of Sociology<\/em>, 47: 178-188, March 1996.<\/p>\n<p>`1991 Census SARs: opportunities and pitfalls in the labour market data&#8217;, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 9: 569-582, September 1995.<\/p>\n<p>`Five feminist myths about women&#8217;s employment&#8217;, <em>British Journal of Sociology<\/em>, 46: 429-455, September 1995. \u00a0Reprinted pages 11-37 in <em>Women and Management<\/em> (eds) C Gatrell, C L Cooper and E E Kossek, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010.<\/p>\n<p>`A century of change in occupational segregation 1891-1991&#8242;, <em>Journal of Historical Sociology<\/em>, 7: 435-454, December 1994.<\/p>\n<p>`Using the LS and the SARs in the context of research on occupational change&#8217;, <em>The OPCS Longitudinal Study Update<\/em>, No. 8: 7-13, June 1994.<\/p>\n<p>`Segregated and integrated occupations: a new framework for analysing social change&#8217;, <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>,\u00a0 9: 289-314, December 1993.<\/p>\n<p>`Refocusing research on occupational segregation: reply to Watts&#8217;, <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>, 9: 321-324, December 1993.<\/p>\n<p>`The myth of rising female employment&#8217;, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 7: 97-120, March 1993.<\/p>\n<p>`Explaining trends in occupational segregation: the measurement, causes and consequences of the sexual division of labour&#8217;, <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>, 8: 127-152, September 1992.<\/p>\n<p>`Grateful slaves and self-made women:\u00a0 fact and fantasy in women&#8217;s work orientations&#8217;,\u00a0 \u00a0 <em>European Sociological Review<\/em>, 7: 101-121, September 1991.<\/p>\n<p>`Cross-national comparative research on the European Community: the EC Labour Force Surveys&#8217;, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 5: 101-117, March 1991.<\/p>\n<p>`Core and periphery in employers&#8217; workforce strategies: evidence from the 1987 ELUS survey&#8217;, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 4: 157-188, June 1990.<\/p>\n<p>`Workforce restructuring in Europe in the 1980s&#8217;, <em>International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations<\/em>, 5, part 4: 167-203, March 1990.<\/p>\n<p><em>Barriers to Business Start-Up: A study of the flow into and out of self-employment<\/em>, Research Paper No. 71, London: Department of Employment, January 1990 (with others).<\/p>\n<p>`Workforce restructuring, social insurance coverage and the black economy&#8217;, <em>Journal of Social Policy<\/em>, 18: 471-503, October 1989.<\/p>\n<p>`Employment rights: a comparison of part-time and full-time employees&#8217;, <em>Industrial Law Journal<\/em>, 18: 69-83, June 1989.<\/p>\n<p>`New recruits to self-employment in the 1980s&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 97: 286-297, June 1989.<\/p>\n<p>`Identifying fast growth small firms&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 97: 29-41, January 1989.<\/p>\n<p>`Self-employment in Britain: recent trends and current issues&#8217;, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 2: 421-450, December 1988.<\/p>\n<p>`Women at work: recent research on women&#8217;s employment&#8217;, review article, <em>Work, Employment and Society<\/em>, 2: 103-113, March 1988.<\/p>\n<p>`Trends in the flexible workforce&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 95: 549-560, November 1987.\u00a0 Reprinted in <em>Restructuring Britain<\/em>, Course D314 Supplementary Readings, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1989.<\/p>\n<p>`Homeworking in Britain: key findings from the national survey of home-based workers&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 95: 92-104, February 1987. Reprinted in\u00a0<em>On Work<\/em> (ed) Ray Pahl, 1988, Blackwell.<\/p>\n<p>`Employers&#8217; use of homework, outwork and freelances&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 92: 144-150, April 1984.<\/p>\n<p>`Homework and outwork:\u00a0 national estimates from two surveys&#8217;,\u00a0 <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 92: 7-12, January 1984.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/06\/1983-SocReview-Admin-Records.pdf\">`Research based on administrative records&#8217;<\/a>, <em>Sociological Review<\/em>, 31: 489-519, August 1983.<\/p>\n<p>`The social consequences of high unemployment&#8217;, <em>Journal of Social Policy<\/em>, 11: 433-467, October 1982.<\/p>\n<p>`Homeworking in the London clothing industry&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 90: 369-376, September 1982.<\/p>\n<p>`Secondary analysis and the relationship between official and academic social research&#8217;, <em>Sociology<\/em>, 16: 12-28, February 1982.\u00a0 Reprinted 2012 in <em>SAGE Secondary Data Analysis<\/em> (ed) John Goodwin, London: Sage.<\/p>\n<p>`Job segregation: trends in the 1970s&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 89: 521-529, December 1981.<\/p>\n<p>`Integrated social data systems: the role of household censuses and surveys as sources of social, demographic and manpower data in Britain&#8217;, <em>Social Science Information Studies<\/em>, pp 13-21, October 1980.<\/p>\n<p>`Homeworking: some new evidence&#8217;, <em>Employment Gazette<\/em>, 88: 1105-1110, October 1980.<\/p>\n<p>`Census reports as documentary evidence: the census commentaries 1801-1951&#8242;, <em>Sociological Review<\/em>, 28: 551-580, August 1980.<\/p>\n<p>`Social aspects of employment: data for policy research&#8217;, <em>Journal of Social Policy<\/em>, 9: 77-98, January 1980.<\/p>\n<p>`The population census and its by-products: databases for research&#8217;, <em>International Social Science Journal<\/em>, 31: 343-352, April 1979 (English, French and Spanish editions).\u00a0 Spanish translation reprinted in United Nations Comisi\u00f3n Econ\u00f3mica para America Latina (CEPAL) <em>Bolet\u00edn de Actividades de Censos de Poblaci\u00f3n y Habitaci\u00f3n<\/em>, No. 6, June 1980, Santiago, pp 9-20.<\/p>\n<p>`Sexual divisions within the labour force: occupational segregation&#8217;, <em>Department of Employment Gazette<\/em>, 86: 1264-79, November 1978.<\/p>\n<p><em>Census Confidentiality, Microdata and Census Analysis<\/em>, Occasional Paper No. 3, London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, 1978.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Book reviews<\/strong> for <em>American Journal of Sociology; Population and Development Review;\u00a0 British Journal of Sociology; British Journal of Industrial Relations; International Journal of Manpower;\u00a0 Industrial Relations Journal; Journal of Social Policy; Journal of the Royal Statistical Society; Journal of Gender Studies; Sex Roles; Feminist Economics; Economic History Review; Work and Occupations; Sociology; Sociological Review; Social Forces; Journal of Applied Statistics; Sociologica; Work, Employment and Society; British Journal of Criminology; inter alia. <\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Referee<\/strong>\u00a0<\/em>for\u00a0papers submitted to: <em>European Sociological Review; International Sociology; American Journal of Sociology; American Sociological Review; British Journal of Sociology; Population and Development Review;\u00a0Sociology; Sociological Review; \u00a0Journal of Social Policy; Cambridge Journal of Economics; Journal of the Royal Statistical Society;\u00a0Industrial Relations Journal; Human Relations; Organisation; Journal of Management Studies; British Journal of Industrial Relations; Feminist Economics; Journal of Historical Sociology;\u00a0 Acta Sociologica; Social Forces;\u00a0 Journal of Marriage and the Family; Demography; European Societies; Comparative Sociology; Social Problems; \u00a0Comparative Social Research Yearbook; Gender, Work and Organisations; Sex Roles; Times Literary Supplement;<\/em> and several\u00a0social geography and ethnic studies journals.<em><br \/>\n<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8216;The sugar in his tea: sexuality, patriarchy and sexual politics&#8217;, and &#8216;A response to comments: The modern significance of sexuality &#8211; and the sex drive&#8217;, reply to four comments by Marzio Barbagli, Rosella Ghigi, Roger Friedland and Eric Anderson, Sociologica, &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/?page_id=21\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":3,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":38,"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":308,"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/21\/revisions\/308"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.catherinehakim.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}